伺服电机与执行器
1. 介绍
1.1. 背景
执行器是具身智能"工具执行"能力的物理载体。政策口径上,工信部《人形机器人创新发展指导意见》(2023-11)将"机器肢"(仿人机械臂、灵巧手、腿足)与"机器体"(轻量化骨骼、高强度本体)列为关键技术群,并明确部署高功率密度执行器。市场口径上,执行器是放量最确定的环节:一台人形机器人需要 14–17 个谐波减速器(工业机器人仅 3–5 个,雪球产业链分析口径);灵巧手约占人形机器人整机成本 20%–30%,东吴证券预测 2030 年灵巧手市场空间 5520 亿元(预测口径)。灼识咨询预测中国机器人谐波减速器出货从 2025 年约 140 万台增至 2030 年 2070 万台(CAGR 72.4%,人形占比从 11% 升至 82%)。
2025 年的量产数据为这一环节提供了规模验证:宇树 2025 年人形机器人出货超 5500 台(招股书报道口径)、核心部组件自研自产率超 90%;智元 2026-03-30 第 10000 台通用具身机器人下线。本体的放量直接带动关节电机、减速器、丝杠、空心杯电机等上游部件。
1.2. 定义与范围
伺服电机与执行器方向覆盖机器人关节与末端的驱动、传动与抓握,在 AI Harness 语境下特指下述环节:
| 环节 | 内容 | 代表技术 |
|---|---|---|
| 关节驱动 | 关节电机选型与一体化关节 | 内转子径向磁通(30–80 mm 关节主流)、外转子(100–180 mm 腿足关节)、轴向磁通 |
| 减速传动 | 转矩放大与精度保障 | 谐波减速器、RV 减速器、行星减速器、行星滚柱丝杠、滚珠丝杠 |
| 末端执行 | 灵巧手与抓握 | 腱绳传动、连杆、微型丝杠、空心杯电机 |
| 台架验证 | 性能与寿命试验 | GB/T 43200-2023《机器人一体化关节性能及试验方法》 |
边界说明:本方向不覆盖控制算法(归 小脑(运动控制))与传感元件原理(归 材料与传感器);关节内置的力矩传感器在两方向交界处讨论。
1.3. 在 AI Harness 体系中的定位
执行器在六层模型中的映射如下:
| Harness 层 | 本方向的具体承载物 | 说明 |
|---|---|---|
| L1 上下文工程 | 执行器规格书与选型知识 | 规格书是智能体"知道工具能做什么"的输入 |
| L2 工具与执行 | 电机、减速器、丝杠、腱绳的物理执行 | 本方向最重的一层:执行器性能即"工具契约"的物理上限 |
| L3 编排与控制 | 关节空间与任务空间的调度配合 | 由小脑方向承担,执行器提供可调度的能力边界 |
| L4 记忆与状态 | 衰减与寿命台账 | 运行小时数、磨损记录是 L4 的硬件侧台账 |
| L5 评估与观测 | 台架试验(GB/T 43200-2023) | 传动精度、扭转刚度、寿命的判定器 |
| L6 治理与安全 | 过载保护、机械限位 | 物理层的安全兜底,独立于软件护栏 |
核心判断:执行器方向的瓶颈在 L2。执行器一旦定型,转矩密度、背隙、响应带宽就是上层算法的天花板——小脑的控制带宽再高,也无法突破谐波减速器的机械谐振。硬件层的每次改进等效于扩大 L2 工具契约的能力边界:绿的三次谐波把传动精度从传统二次谐波的 30–60 弧秒压缩到 10 弧秒以内、扭转刚度提升 2–3 倍(公司年报/研报口径),这类改进对上层控制的价值不亚于一次算法迭代。
1.4. 发展现状
执行器三分类(未来智库《机器人电机技术全景解析》,2025-12):
- 柔性执行器:电机 + 高减速比减速器,高转矩密度,但有机械谐振、力透明度低。
- 弹性执行器:柔性执行器 + 弹性元件,抗冲击强,但力控带宽低。
- 准直驱执行器(QDD):高转矩密度电机 + 低减速比,力透明度高、反驱性强,但转矩密度低。
电机拓扑:内转子径向磁通为 30–80 mm 关节主流;外转子用于 100–180 mm 腿足关节(宇树、本末、灵足时代采用"外转子 + 行星减速器"准直驱模式);轴向磁通转矩密度高但存在技术瓶颈("青龙"、广汽 GoMate 已尝试);空心杯电机(8–20 mm)为微型关节与灵巧手专用。四大核心性能要求:高转矩密度、低转矩波动、强过载能力、散热。
图 3-1|执行器方案对比矩阵(定性)
示意:基于本文 1.4 节行业研究口径绘制,红框为本组标注的腿足关节主流路线。
2. 名词解释
| 术语 | 英文 / 缩写 | 释义 |
|---|---|---|
| 伺服电机 | Servo Motor | 带闭环反馈控制的执行电机,是机器人关节的驱动核心 |
| 准直驱执行器 | Quasi-Direct Drive,QDD | 高转矩密度电机 + 低减速比的执行器方案,力透明度高、反驱性强 |
| 谐波减速器 | Harmonic Drive | 由波发生器、柔轮、刚轮构成的减速器,人形机器人单机用量约 14–17 个 |
| RV 减速器 | Rotary Vector Reducer | 摆线针轮类高刚度减速器,RV 在人形机器人上的具体用量与精度数据本轮未检索到,[待填写] |
| 行星减速器 | Planetary Gearbox | 减速比 3:1–100:1、背隙 1–5 arcmin、效率 90–97% 的减速器 |
| 行星滚柱丝杠 | Planetary Roller Screw | 以螺纹滚柱传动的直线执行器,接触点多 10 倍以上、承载为滚珠丝杠 3–5 倍(另有寿命提升 15 倍口径,并列) |
| 滚珠丝杠 | Ball Screw | 精度 ±0.01 mm 的直线传动元件 |
| 空心杯电机 | Coreless Motor | 无铁芯转子的微型电机,效率 70%–90%,直径可小至 3–4 mm |
| 腱绳传动 | Tendon Drive | 以绳索远端传动的驱动方式,自由度可达 20+ 但寿命约 5k–10k 次 |
| 转矩密度 | Torque Density | 单位重量输出的转矩,衡量电机功率密度的核心指标 |
| 力透明度 | Force Transparency | 执行器对外力的感知与响应能力,与减速比负相关 |
| 弧秒 | Arcsecond | 角度精度单位,绿的谐波三次谐波传动精度不超过 10 弧秒(传统二次谐波 30–60 弧秒) |
| 背隙 | Backlash | 传动链反向空程,行星减速器典型 1–5 arcmin |
| 一体化关节 | Integrated Joint | 电机、减速器、编码器、驱控一体化模组,试验依据 GB/T 43200-2023 |
| P 型齿 | P-Type Tooth Profile | 绿的谐波自研齿形,用于打破哈默纳科 IH 齿形专利 |
| 无齿槽转矩 | Cogging-free Torque | 空心杯电机因无铁芯而无齿槽效应,利于精细控制 |
3. 案例
3.1. 特斯拉 Optimus Gen-3 灵巧手:腱绳 + 连杆 + 微型丝杠的复合方案
背景。Optimus 是执行器方向受关注度最高的整机项目。Musk 称"灵巧手约占 Optimus 一半的工程量"。需要注意:特斯拉从未官方发布整机完整规格,本案例参数均来自券商研报与媒体(中信建投、RobotToday、WebProNews 等)口径,可信度中高,引用必须标注"第三方口径"。
方案。Gen-3 灵巧手 22 自由度:食指/中指/无名指各 4、拇指/小指各 5(DIP/PIP 各 1 + MCP 2,小指含双对掌关节)。驱动方案为"腱绳(屈伸)+ 连杆(外展内收)+ 微型滚珠丝杠"复合:驱动器前置前臂、腱绳传动,微型滚珠丝杠由每手 13 套增至 17 套;每根腱绳配力反馈传感器。腱绳方案的自由度优势(20+)与寿命短板(5k–10k 次)在本案例中同时体现;另一供应链传闻口径给出 Gen-3 无故障工时约 500 小时,对比工业级 2000 小时标准(中低可信度,仅供参考)。价值量口径:Optimus Gen1 每手 12 个空心杯电机、双手 24 个、单机价值约 7200 元,空心杯在灵巧手 BOM 中占比约 38%;灵巧手 BOM 目标从 1.2 万美元降至 3000 美元以下。
效果。Gen-3 原型 2025 年 10–11 月定稿(供应链口径);第三方汇编(humanoid.press,中低可信度)称 Optimus 3 整机 173 cm、57 kg、约 40+ 自由度、2.3 kWh 电池、8–10 小时续航、"已内部部署 1000+ 台"(未经特斯拉官方确认)。可确认的工程结论是:腱绳 + 丝杠的复合传动路线以牺牲部分寿命换取 22 自由度的手部灵巧性,且力反馈被前置到每根腱绳——这等于把 L6 的力边界感知下沉到了传动链内部。可信度:结构方案为多源交叉(中高);整机数字为中低(第三方)。
3.2. 绿的谐波:三次谐波减速器与国产替代
背景。谐波减速器长期由哈默纳科(Harmonic Drive)主导,全球份额存在三个悬殊口径:约 40%(狭义/机器人口径)、58%(2022 年口径)、超 80%(代理商宣传口径);另有"中国厂商 2025 年全球份额约 75%"的口径,疑为"中国厂商在全球产能中占比"——四条口径并列呈现,本文不择一冒充唯一事实。绿的谐波为国内龙头,国内市占率在不同口径下为 26%–60% 区间、全球约 12–15%。
方案。绿的谐波自研 P 型齿打破哈默纳科 IH 齿形专利;三次谐波减速器传动精度不超过 10 弧秒(传统二次谐波 30–60 弧秒),扭转刚度提升 2–3 倍;Y 系列 1 弧分精度、寿命 1 万–1.2 万小时。商业侧:价格约为哈默纳科同型号的 30%–70%(约 ¥1320–1400 对 ¥3000–5000);交货周期 1–2 个月对进口 3–6 个月;产能约 60 万台/年并扩产至 140 万台。微型化方面,来福谐波 03 系列微型谐波仅 13 g,面向灵巧手与微型关节。
效果。三次谐波的 10 弧秒精度与 2–3 倍扭转刚度直接抬高了小脑控制的硬件上限——精度与刚度的提升等效于降低控制环的补偿负担。价格与交期优势(30%–70% 价格、1–2 个月交期)则把人形机器人整机的 BOM 与爬产周期同时压缩。哈默纳科的护城河仍在:传动误差小于 1 弧分、V-Ti-Nb 微合金化柔轮材料工艺(行业资料口径)。该案例是"执行器改进 = L2 工具契约升级"的最直接证据。可信度:技术参数为公司年报/研报口径(中高);市场份额多口径冲突(中,已并列标注)。
3.3. 傅利叶 FSA 2.0:一体化执行器与万台交付
背景。傅利叶 2015 年成立、康复机器人起家,截至 2025Q1 累计交付超 10000 台(证券时报口径),2025 年双足人形交付目标 300 台——是少数以"万"为单位交付的国内厂商,其执行器自研路线经过了康复场景的长周期验证。
方案。GR-2 搭载自研 FSA 2.0 执行器(Force Sharing Actuator,一体化关节执行器)及 12 自由度灵巧手;GR-3(2025-08 发布)身高 1.65 m、重 71 kg、全身 55 自由度、单手负载 3 kg,配双电池热插拔(3 小时续航),头部与躯干布置 31 个触摸传感器,继续采用自研一体化执行器 + 12 自由度灵巧手。FSA 路线把电机、减速器、编码器、驱控收进一个标准化模组——即 L2 工具契约的"标准件化"。
效果。一体化执行器的价值在于把执行器从"定制件"变为"有规格契约的标准件":整机集成商按扭矩、精度、响应选型,而非联合调试传动链。这与软件域"工具注册 + 接口契约"的 Harness 思路同构。配套的 GB/T 43200-2023《机器人一体化关节性能及试验方法》为这类模组提供了国家级的判定器。可信度:官方与证券时报口径(中高)。
4. 实践标准
4.1. AGENTS.md 规范(执行器方向)
以下为伺服电机与执行器方向的 AGENTS.md 完整可复制内容,是组级 AGENTS.md 的裁剪与强化版本:
# AGENTS.md —— 具身智能组 · 伺服电机与执行器方向
## 角色与边界
- **角色**:执行器方向工程智能体,负责关节电机与减速器选型对比、传动方案分析、台架试验方案编制与试验数据分析。
- **边界**:不直接驱动台架与试验设备(六维力标定台、扭矩台、耐久台为人工操作设备);不带电带载启动试验。
- **第一原则**:参数必须溯源。选型结论只基于官方规格页或标准试验方法数据。
## 环境假设
- 声明目标关节与工况(峰值扭矩、转速、负载谱、空间包络、散热条件)。
- 声明候选执行器清单与官方规格来源;第三方汇编参数标注"第三方口径,未经官方确认"。
- 声明试验依据标准:GB/T 43200-2023(一体化关节)、GB/T 44251-2024(腿式机器人)按需引用。
## 上下文加载顺序(Context Budget)
- 必载:工况需求表、候选件规格书摘要、在用执行器的衰减台账。
- 次载:供应链口径数据(价格、交期、产能)与来源性质。
- 禁止:完整 CAD 装配体与长扫描报告进入上下文。
## 工具契约
- 对比表字段统一:额定/峰值扭矩、精度(弧秒或 arcmin)、背隙、效率、寿命、重量、价格、交期。
- 数值缺失一律写 [待填写];禁止用同类产品数据填充。
- 市场份额类数据必须列全冲突口径(如哈默纳科 40% / 58% / 80% 与中国厂商 75% 四口径并列)。
## 任务执行流程(SOP)
- S1 解析工况为可判定指标;S2 规格对表初筛;S3 拟定台架试验方案(依据 GB/T 43200-2023);S4 试验数据回收与分析(人工执行试验);S5 产出选型建议与风险清单。
## 验证与证据要求
- 每项关键参数标注来源:官方规格页 / 标准试验 / 研报 / 媒体传闻(传闻不得进入选型结论)。
- 寿命与精度结论必须来自台架实测或标准方法,禁止引用宣传口径。
## 失败与升级策略
- 规格数据冲突:并列呈现并请求人工裁决;禁止静默择一。
- 台架数据与规格书不符:冻结选型,升级供应商澄清流程。
## 安全与合规红线
- 过载保护与机械限位设计不做省略;试验方案须含防护与急停要求(参照 ISO 10218-1/2:2025 安全要求框架)。
- 关键份额与独家供应风险须在结论中显式提示。
## 禁止事项
- 禁止编造规格参数;禁止把供应链传闻写成确认订单;禁止选择性引用有利口径。
## 输出格式
- 选型报告结构:工况 → 候选对比表(字段统一)→ 试验方案 → 数据分析 → 建议与风险(含供应链口径提示)。
## 评估与自检
- 自检项:参数溯源、口径并列、[待填写] 规范、试验依据标准、风险清单齐备。 4.2. SKILL.md 规范(执行器方向)
---
name: embodied-actuator-selection
description: 执行器方向技能。当需要对比关节电机、减速器、丝杠、灵巧手等执行器方案,编制台架试验方案,或分析传动精度与寿命数据时使用。
version: 1.0
created: 2026-09-12
---
# 执行器方向技能
## 适用场景
- 关节电机与减速器选型对比(谐波 / RV / 行星 / 丝杠 / 腱绳)。
- 灵巧手驱动方案分析(空心杯 / 无刷有齿槽 / 腱绳 + 连杆 + 微型丝杠复合)。
- 一体化关节台架试验方案编制(GB/T 43200-2023)与试验数据分析。
## 前置条件
- 目标关节工况(扭矩、转速、负载谱、包络)明确。
- 候选件官方规格来源可获取;份额类数据备好多口径。
## 输入
- 工况需求表;候选件规格书;衰减台账;试验设备能力说明。
## 输出
- 统一字段对比表、台架试验方案、数据分析报告、选型建议与风险清单。
## 执行步骤
1. 工况解析:把需求转为可判定指标(含安全裕度)。
2. 规格对表:统一字段初筛;缺失项写 [待填写]。
3. 试验方案:引用 GB/T 43200-2023 拟定项目与判据。
4. 数据分析:实测与规格对照,异常升级澄清。
5. 结论:建议 + 供应链风险 + 口径标注。
## 质量标准(DoD)
- 全部参数带单位与来源;冲突口径并列;传闻不进结论;无占位符。
## 常见失败与处理
- 规格冲突:并列呈现请求人工裁决。
- 试验与规格不符:冻结选型走供应商澄清。
## 示例
- 为髋关节对比两款谐波减速器:以峰值扭矩、10 弧秒级精度、背隙、寿命字段对表,按 GB/T 43200-2023 拟定台架方案。 4.3. 落地检查清单
| # | 检查项 | 通过标准 | 必检 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 工况解析 | 需求已转为可判定指标(含裕度) | 是 |
| 2 | 参数溯源 | 关键参数有官方或标准来源 | 是 |
| 3 | 口径并列 | 份额等多口径数据未择一冒充 | 是 |
| 4 | 传闻隔离 | 供应链传闻未进入选型结论 | 是 |
| 5 | 单位规范 | 扭矩 N·m、精度弧秒/arcmin、效率 % 统一 | 是 |
| 6 | 试验依据 | 方案引用 GB/T 43200-2023 等标准 | 试验必检 |
| 7 | 安全设计 | 过载保护与限位未省略 | 是 |
| 8 | 缺失标注 | 数据缺失处为 [待填写] | 是 |
| 9 | 台账更新 | 在用执行器衰减记录已同步 | 量产必检 |
| 10 | 供应链风险 | 独家供应与交期风险已提示 | 是 |
| 11 | 术语区分 | 智能化分级与 Harness 六层未混用 | 是 |
| 12 | 占位符清理 | 无 XX、___ 等非标准占位符 | 是 |
5. 总结
执行器方向的 Harness 逻辑可以概括为一句话:执行器就是 L2 工具契约的物理形态。软件域里,工具契约规定"这个工具接受什么输入、承诺什么输出、超出边界会怎样";执行器域里,这组承诺被翻译成额定扭矩、传动精度、背隙、效率与寿命——并且一旦装上整机就无法通过版本更新修改。
三条工程结论。第一,路线之争没有终局,工况决定选型:柔性执行器的高转矩密度、QDD 的力透明度、腱绳的自由度优势各有代价,特斯拉以腱绳 + 丝杠复合换 22 自由度、宇树以外转子 + 行星换腿足准直驱,说明正确的问法不是"哪种路线赢"而是"这个关节的负载谱与控制需求是什么"。第二,国产替代正在同时改写价格曲线与精度曲线:绿的三次谐波 10 弧秒精度、30%–70% 价格与 1–2 个月交期,把执行器从"进口定制件"变为"国产标准件",这是整机从样机走向万台量产(宇树 5500 台、智元 10000 台)的供应链前提。第三,标准是执行器的判定器:GB/T 43200-2023 让一体化关节的性能有了国家级试验方法,也让"执行器规格 ≈ 工具契约"从类比变为可执行的验收流程。
信息缺口声明
以下条目未获一手来源确认,已在正文中标注:
- RV 减速器(纳博特斯克)在人形机器人上的具体用量与精度:本轮未检索到可靠数据,
[待填写]。 - 特斯拉 Optimus 官方完整规格(自由度、扭矩、相机配置):特斯拉从未官方发布;humanoid.press 等第三方汇编可信度中低,仅作参考并标注。
- Gen-3 无故障工时约 500 小时与"内部部署 1000+ 台":供应链传闻与第三方说法,中低可信度。
- 谐波减速器全球份额四口径(哈默纳科约 40% / 58% / 超 80%,中国厂商 75%)严重分歧,仅并列呈现、注明统计口径差异。
- 拓普集团约 30 亿元旋转关节订单与年产能 100 万台规划:传闻口径,本文未引用为事实。
- 银河通用六自由度操作精度误差小于 0.5 mm:公司/百科口径,缺第三方复现。
- 宇树招股书原文 URL 未获取,自研自产率超 90% 等数字来自媒体转述。
6. 参考资料
- 机器人电机技术全景解析 — 未来智库,2025-12。https://www.industrysourcing.cn/article/471909
- 宇树科技官方支持页(H1 / G1 / M107 电机规格)— 宇树科技。https://support.unitree.com/home
- 傅利叶 GR-3 发布报道 — 证券时报,2025-08-06。https://www.stcn.com/article/detail/2975614.html
- 世界机器人大会官方展商介绍(因时机器人 RH5DG2 等)— 世界机器人大会,2025。https://www.worldrobotconference.com/news/3235.html
- 人形机器人创新发展指导意见 — 工业和信息化部,2023-11。https://www.ncsti.gov.cn/zcfg/zcwj/202311/P020231103482413965397.pdf
- 我国发布人形机器人与具身智能标准体系(2026 版)报道 — 人民日报海外版,2026-02-28。https://peoplesdaily.pdnews.cn/china/er/30051524844
- Collaborative Robot Safety Standards 2026: ISO 10218-2025 — EVS Int,2025。https://www.evsint.com/zh-CN/collaborative-robot-safety-standards-2026-iso-10218-2025-ts-15066/
- Collaborative Robot Safety Standards — InMotion Global。https://www.inmotion.global/resources/cobot-safety/collaborative-robot-safety-standards/
- 具身智能向纵深加速 — 数字中国网,2025-12。https://www.digitalchina.gov.cn/2025/xwzx/szkx/202512/t20251230_5263761.htm
- 具身智能:解码中国机器人产业的破局之路 — 中宏网,2026-06。https://www.zhonghongwang.com/show-278-464160-1.html
- 《机器人一体化关节性能及试验方法》(GB/T 43200-2023)— 国家标准,全国机器人标准化技术委员会(SAC/TC 591),URL 未确认,文献名 + 标准号引用。
- 《机器人多维力/力矩传感器检测规范》(GB/T 43199-2023)— 国家标准,全国机器人标准化技术委员会(SAC/TC 591),URL 未确认,文献名 + 标准号引用。
- 国内知名工业机器人用六维力传感器生产厂商 — 中国电子元件行业协会敏感元器件与传感器分会,2026-03-10。http://sensor.ic-ceca.org.cn/hangyezixun/508.html
Servo Motors and Actuators
1. Introduction
1.1. Background
Actuators are the physical carrier of embodied intelligence's "tool execution" capability. In terms of policy, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology's Guidelines on Innovation and Development of Humanoid Robots (2023-11) lists "machine limbs" (humanoid robotic arms, dexterous hands, legs and feet) and the "machine body" (lightweight skeleton, high-strength chassis) as key technology groups, and explicitly calls for the deployment of high-power-density actuators. In market terms, actuators are the segment with the most certain volume growth: a single humanoid robot needs 14–17 harmonic reducers (industrial robots need only 3–5, per Xueqiu supply-chain analysis); a dexterous hand accounts for roughly 20%–30% of a humanoid robot's total cost, and Dongwu Securities forecasts the dexterous-hand market to reach 552 billion yuan by 2030 (forecast figures). CIC (Zhishu Consulting) forecasts China's robotic harmonic-reducer shipments to grow from about 1.4 million units in 2025 to 20.7 million units by 2030 (CAGR 72.4%, with the humanoid share rising from 11% to 82%).
The 2025 mass-production figures validate the scale of this segment: Unitree shipped over 5,500 humanoid robots in 2025 (prospectus-reported figures) with a self-developed/self-manufactured rate for core components exceeding 90%; AgileX's (Zhiyuan) 10,000th general-purpose embodied robot rolled off the line on 2026-03-30. The volume growth of the chassis directly drives upstream components such as joint motors, reducers, ball screws, and coreless motors.
1.2. Definition and Scope
Servo Motors and Actuators covers the drive, transmission, and grasping of robot joints and end effectors. In the AI Harness context, it specifically refers to the following segments:
| Segment | Content | Representative Technology |
|---|---|---|
| Joint drive | Joint motor selection and integrated joints | Inner-rotor radial flux (mainstream for 30–80 mm joints), outer-rotor (100–180 mm leg-and-foot joints), axial flux |
| Reduction & transmission | Torque amplification and precision assurance | Harmonic reducers, RV reducers, planetary gearboxes, planetary roller screws, ball screws |
| End-effector actuation | Dexterous hands and grasping | Tendon drive, linkages, micro ball screws, coreless motors |
| Bench validation | Performance and lifetime testing | GB/T 43200-2023 Robotic Integrated Joints — Performance and Test Methods |
Boundary note: This direction does not cover control algorithms (attributed to Cerebellum (Motion Control)) or sensing-element principles (attributed to Materials & Sensors); torque sensors built into joints are discussed at the interface between the two directions.
1.3. Position in the AI Harness System
The mapping of actuators in the six-layer model is as follows:
| Harness Layer | Concrete Carrier in This Direction | Note |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Context Engineering | Actuator specifications and selection knowledge | The specification sheet is the input by which the agent "knows what a tool can do" |
| L2 Tools & Execution | Physical execution of motors, reducers, screws, tendons | The heaviest layer for this direction: actuator performance is the physical ceiling of the "tool contract" |
| L3 Orchestration & Control | Scheduling coordination between joint space and task space | Carried by the cerebellum direction; actuators provide the schedulable capability boundary |
| L4 Memory & State | Degradation and lifetime ledger | Running hours and wear records are the hardware-side ledger of L4 |
| L5 Evaluation & Observation | Bench testing (GB/T 43200-2023) | The arbiter of transmission precision, torsional stiffness, and lifetime |
| L6 Governance & Safety | Overload protection, mechanical limits | Physical-layer safety backstop, independent of software guardrails |
Core judgment: The bottleneck of the actuator direction lies in L2. Once an actuator is finalized, torque density, backlash, and response bandwidth become the ceiling for upper-layer algorithms — no matter how high the cerebellum's control bandwidth, it cannot break through the mechanical resonance of a harmonic reducer. Every improvement at the hardware layer is equivalent to expanding the capability boundary of the L2 tool contract: Leadrive's third harmonics compress transmission precision from the 30–60 arcseconds of traditional second harmonics to within 10 arcseconds BW and improve torsional stiffness by 2–3× (company annual-report/research-report figures). Such an improvement is no less valuable to upper-layer control than an algorithmic iteration.
1.4. Current State of Development
Three-way classification of actuators (Future Think Tank Panoramic Analysis of Robot Motor Technology, 2025-12):
- Flexible actuators: motor + high-reduction-ratio gearbox, high torque density, but with mechanical resonance and low force transparency.
- Elastic actuators: flexible actuator + elastic element, strong impact resistance, but low force-control bandwidth.
- Quasi-direct-drive actuators (QDD): high-torque-density motor + low reduction ratio, high force transparency and strong back-drivability, but low torque density.
Motor topologies: inner-rotor radial flux is mainstream for 30–80 mm joints; the outer rotor is used in 100–180 mm leg-and-foot joints (Unitree, BEMO, and Lingzu Times adopt the "outer rotor + planetary gearbox" quasi-direct-drive mode); axial flux offers high torque density but has technical bottlenecks ("Qinglong" and GAC GoMate have attempted it); coreless motors (8–20 mm) are dedicated to micro joints and dexterous hands. Four core performance requirements: high torque density, low torque ripple, strong overload capability, and heat dissipation.
Figure 3-1|Actuator scheme comparison matrix (qualitative)
Illustration: drawn based on the industry-research figures in section 1.4 of this document; the red box marks the mainstream leg-and-foot joint route noted by this group.
2. Glossary
| Term | English / Abbreviation | Definition |
|---|---|---|
| Servo motor | Servo Motor | An actuation motor with closed-loop feedback control; the drive core of a robot joint |
| Quasi-direct-drive actuator | Quasi-Direct Drive, QDD | An actuator scheme of a high-torque-density motor plus a low reduction ratio, with high force transparency and strong back-drivability |
| Harmonic reducer | Harmonic Drive | A reducer composed of a wave generator, flexspline, and circular spline; a humanoid robot uses about 14–17 per unit |
| RV reducer | Rotary Vector Reducer | A cycloidal-pin high-stiffness reducer; the specific usage and precision data for RV in humanoid robots were not found in this round, [To be filled] |
| Planetary gearbox | Planetary Gearbox | A reducer with reduction ratios of 3:1–100:1, backlash of 1–5 arcmin, and efficiency of 90–97% |
| Planetary roller screw | Planetary Roller Screw | A linear actuator using threaded rollers for transmission; more than 10× the contact points, and 3–5× the load capacity of a ball screw (a separate 15× lifetime-improvement figure also exists, presented side by side) |
| Ball screw | Ball Screw | A linear transmission element with ±0.01 mm precision |
| Coreless motor | Coreless Motor | A micro motor with a coreless rotor; 70%–90% efficiency, diameter can be as small as 3–4 mm |
| Tendon drive | Tendon Drive | A drive method transmitting force distally via cables; can reach 20+ degrees of freedom but has a lifetime of about 5k–10k cycles |
| Torque density | Torque Density | Torque output per unit weight; a core metric of motor power density |
| Force transparency | Force Transparency | An actuator's ability to sense and respond to external force, negatively correlated with the reduction ratio |
| Arcsecond | Arcsecond | A unit of angular precision; Leadrive harmonic third-harmonic transmission precision does not exceed 10 arcseconds (traditional second harmonics: 30–60 arcseconds) |
| Backlash | Backlash | The reverse play in a transmission chain; planetaries typically 1–5 arcmin |
| Integrated joint | Integrated Joint | A module integrating motor, reducer, encoder, and drive-and-control; tested per GB/T 43200-2023 |
| P-type tooth profile | P-Type Tooth Profile | Leadrive's self-developed tooth profile, used to break Harmonix Drive's IH-tooth-profile patent |
| Cogging-free torque | Cogging-free Torque | Because a coreless motor has no iron core, it has no cogging effect, which benefits fine control |
3. Case Studies
3.1. Tesla Optimus Gen-3 Dexterous Hand: a composite scheme of tendons + linkages + micro ball screws
Background. Optimus is the whole-machine project receiving the most attention in the actuator direction. Musk has said the dexterous hand "accounts for about half of Optimus's engineering effort." Note that Tesla has never officially released the machine's full specifications; the parameters in this case all come from broker research reports and media (CITIC Securities, RobotToday, WebProNews, etc.) with medium-to-high reliability, and citations must be marked as "third-party figures."
Approach. The Gen-3 dexterous hand has 22 degrees of freedom: 4 each for the index, middle, and ring fingers and 5 each for the thumb and pinky (1 each for DIP/PIP + 2 for MCP, with the pinky including two opposition joints). The drive scheme is a composite of "tendon (flexion/extension) + linkage (abduction/adduction) + micro ball screw": the drivers are placed in the forearm with tendon transmission, and the micro ball screws increase from 13 to 17 per hand; each tendon is paired with a force-feedback sensor. The tendon scheme's freedom advantage (20+) and its lifetime shortfall (5k–10k cycles) both manifest in this case; another supply-chain-rumor figure gives the Gen-3's fault-free operating time at about 500 hours, compared with the industrial-grade standard of 2,000 hours (medium-to-low reliability, for reference only). Value-added figures: the Optimus Gen1 uses 12 coreless motors per hand and 24 across both hands, with a per-unit value of about ¥7200; coreless motors account for about 38% of the dexterous-hand BOM; the dexterous-hand BOM target is to fall from $12,000 to below $3,000.
Impact. The Gen-3 prototype was finalized in October–November 2025 (supply-chain figures); a third-party compilation (humanoid.press, medium-to-low reliability) states the Optimus 3 whole machine is 173 cm, 57 kg, with about 40+ degrees of freedom, a 2.3 kWh battery, 8–10 hours of endurance, and "1,000+ units already internally deployed" (not officially confirmed by Tesla). The confirmable engineering conclusion is that the composite tendon + screw transmission route trades some lifetime for 22 degrees of hand dexterity, with force feedback pushed down to each tendon — which is equivalent to sinking L6's force-boundary sensing into the transmission chain. Reliability: the structural scheme is cross-verified across multiple sources (medium-high); the whole-machine figures are medium-to-low (third party).
3.2. Leadrive Harmonic: third-harmonic reducers and domestic substitution
Background. Harmonic reducers have long been dominated by Harmonic Drive, with three widely divergent global-share figures: about 40% (narrow/robot figures), 58% (2022 figures), and over 80% (distributor-promotional figures); a separate figure of "Chinese vendors' 2025 global share of about 75%" is suspected to mean "Chinese vendors' share of global capacity" — all four figures are presented side by side, and this document does not single out one as the sole truth. Leadrive is the domestic leader, with a domestic market share ranging from 26%–60% under different figures and roughly 12–15% globally.
Approach. Leadrive's self-developed P-type tooth profile breaks Harmonic Drive's IH-tooth-profile patent; its third-harmonic reducer achieves transmission precision within 10 arcseconds (traditional second harmonic: 30–60 arcseconds) and improves torsional stiffness by 2–3×; the Y series offers 1-arcmin precision and a 10,000–12,000-hour lifetime. Commercially: pricing is about 30%–70% of Harmonic Drive's comparable models (about ¥1320–1400 vs. ¥3000–5000); delivery lead time is 1–2 months vs. 3–6 months for imports; capacity is about 600,000 units/year and expanding to 1.4 million. In miniaturization, Laifu Harmonic's 03-series micro reducer weighs only 13 g, targeting dexterous hands and micro joints.
Impact. The third harmonic's 10-arcsecond precision and 2–3× torsional stiffness directly raise the hardware ceiling of cerebellum control — the improvement in precision and stiffness is equivalent to reducing the compensation burden of the control loop. The price and lead-time advantages (30%–70% pricing, 1–2 months lead time) simultaneously compress the humanoid's whole-machine BOM and its production-ramp cycle. Harmonic Drive's moat remains: transmission error below 1 arcmin and the V-Ti-Nb micro-alloyed flexspline material process (industry-material figures). This case is the most direct evidence of "actuator improvement = L2 tool-contract upgrade." Reliability: technical parameters are company annual-report/research-report figures (medium-high); market-share figures conflict across sources (medium, already marked side by side).
3.3. Fourier FSA 2.0: integrated actuators and delivery to ten thousand units
Background. Founded in 2015 and starting with rehabilitation robots, Fourier had cumulatively delivered over 10,000 units by 2025Q1 (Securities Times figures), with a 2025 delivery target of 300 bipedal humanoids — one of the few domestic vendors delivering in the unit of "ten thousand," whose self-developed actuator route has been validated over a long cycle in rehabilitation scenarios.
Approach. The GR-2 carries the self-developed FSA 2.0 actuator (Force Sharing Actuator, an integrated-joint actuator) and a 12-degree-of-freedom dexterous hand; the GR-3 (released 2025-08) is 1.65 m tall, weighs 71 kg, has 55 degrees of freedom across the body, and a 3 kg single-hand load, with dual hot-swappable batteries (3-hour endurance) and 31 touch sensors on the head and torso, continuing to use the self-developed integrated actuator + 12-degree-of-freedom dexterous hand. The FSA route packs the motor, reducer, encoder, and drive-and-control into a single standardized module — that is, the "standard-part-ization" of the L2 tool contract.
Impact. The value of the integrated actuator lies in turning the actuator from a "custom part" into a "standard part with a specification contract": whole-machine integrators select by torque, precision, and response rather than jointly tuning the transmission chain. This is structurally analogous to the software domain's "tool registration + interface contract" Harness approach. The supporting GB/T 43200-2023 Robotic Integrated Joints — Performance and Test Methods provides a national-level arbiter for such modules. Reliability: official and Securities Times figures (medium-high).
4. Practice Standards
4.1. AGENTS.md Specification (Actuator Direction)
The following is the complete, copyable content of the AGENTS.md for the servo motor and actuator direction, an adapted and reinforced version of the group-level AGENTS.md:
# AGENTS.md —— 具身智能组 · 伺服电机与执行器方向
## 角色与边界
- **角色**:执行器方向工程智能体,负责关节电机与减速器选型对比、传动方案分析、台架试验方案编制与试验数据分析。
- **边界**:不直接驱动台架与试验设备(六维力标定台、扭矩台、耐久台为人工操作设备);不带电带载启动试验。
- **第一原则**:参数必须溯源。选型结论只基于官方规格页或标准试验方法数据。
## 环境假设
- 声明目标关节与工况(峰值扭矩、转速、负载谱、空间包络、散热条件)。
- 声明候选执行器清单与官方规格来源;第三方汇编参数标注"第三方口径,未经官方确认"。
- 声明试验依据标准:GB/T 43200-2023(一体化关节)、GB/T 44251-2024(腿式机器人)按需引用。
## 上下文加载顺序(Context Budget)
- 必载:工况需求表、候选件规格书摘要、在用执行器的衰减台账。
- 次载:供应链口径数据(价格、交期、产能)与来源性质。
- 禁止:完整 CAD 装配体与长扫描报告进入上下文。
## 工具契约
- 对比表字段统一:额定/峰值扭矩、精度(弧秒或 arcmin)、背隙、效率、寿命、重量、价格、交期。
- 数值缺失一律写 [待填写];禁止用同类产品数据填充。
- 市场份额类数据必须列全冲突口径(如哈默纳科 40% / 58% / 80% 与中国厂商 75% 四口径并列)。
## 任务执行流程(SOP)
- S1 解析工况为可判定指标;S2 规格对表初筛;S3 拟定台架试验方案(依据 GB/T 43200-2023);S4 试验数据回收与分析(人工执行试验);S5 产出选型建议与风险清单。
## 验证与证据要求
- 每项关键参数标注来源:官方规格页 / 标准试验 / 研报 / 媒体传闻(传闻不得进入选型结论)。
- 寿命与精度结论必须来自台架实测或标准方法,禁止引用宣传口径。
## 失败与升级策略
- 规格数据冲突:并列呈现并请求人工裁决;禁止静默择一。
- 台架数据与规格书不符:冻结选型,升级供应商澄清流程。
## 安全与合规红线
- 过载保护与机械限位设计不做省略;试验方案须含防护与急停要求(参照 ISO 10218-1/2:2025 安全要求框架)。
- 关键份额与独家供应风险须在结论中显式提示。
## 禁止事项
- 禁止编造规格参数;禁止把供应链传闻写成确认订单;禁止选择性引用有利口径。
## 输出格式
- 选型报告结构:工况 → 候选对比表(字段统一)→ 试验方案 → 数据分析 → 建议与风险(含供应链口径提示)。
## 评估与自检
- 自检项:参数溯源、口径并列、[待填写] 规范、试验依据标准、风险清单齐备。 4.2. SKILL.md Specification (Actuator Direction)
---
name: embodied-actuator-selection
description: 执行器方向技能。当需要对比关节电机、减速器、丝杠、灵巧手等执行器方案,编制台架试验方案,或分析传动精度与寿命数据时使用。
version: 1.0
created: 2026-09-12
---
# 执行器方向技能
## 适用场景
- 关节电机与减速器选型对比(谐波 / RV / 行星 / 丝杠 / 腱绳)。
- 灵巧手驱动方案分析(空心杯 / 无刷有齿槽 / 腱绳 + 连杆 + 微型丝杠复合)。
- 一体化关节台架试验方案编制(GB/T 43200-2023)与试验数据分析。
## 前置条件
- 目标关节工况(扭矩、转速、负载谱、包络)明确。
- 候选件官方规格来源可获取;份额类数据备好多口径。
## 输入
- 工况需求表;候选件规格书;衰减台账;试验设备能力说明。
## 输出
- 统一字段对比表、台架试验方案、数据分析报告、选型建议与风险清单。
## 执行步骤
1. 工况解析:把需求转为可判定指标(含安全裕度)。
2. 规格对表:统一字段初筛;缺失项写 [待填写]。
3. 试验方案:引用 GB/T 43200-2023 拟定项目与判据。
4. 数据分析:实测与规格对照,异常升级澄清。
5. 结论:建议 + 供应链风险 + 口径标注。
## 质量标准(DoD)
- 全部参数带单位与来源;冲突口径并列;传闻不进结论;无占位符。
## 常见失败与处理
- 规格冲突:并列呈现请求人工裁决。
- 试验与规格不符:冻结选型走供应商澄清。
## 示例
- 为髋关节对比两款谐波减速器:以峰值扭矩、10 弧秒级精度、背隙、寿命字段对表,按 GB/T 43200-2023 拟定台架方案。 4.3. Landing Checklist
| # | Check | Passing criteria | Mandatory |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Working-condition analysis | The requirement has been turned into decidable metrics (with margin) | Yes |
| 2 | Parameter sourcing | Key parameters have an official or standard source | Yes |
| 3 | Figures presented side by side | Share and other multi-figure data are not single-outed and passed off as truth | Yes |
| 4 | Rumor isolation | Supply-chain rumors have not entered selection conclusions | Yes |
| 5 | Unit conventions | Torque N·m, precision arcsec/arcmin, efficiency % are unified | Yes |
| 6 | Test basis | The plan cites standards such as GB/T 43200-2023 | Mandatory for testing |
| 7 | Safety design | Overload protection and limits are not omitted | Yes |
| 8 | Missing-value marking | Data gaps are marked as [To be filled] | Yes |
| 9 | Ledger update | Degradation records of actuators in use are synced | Mandatory for mass production |
| 10 | Supply-chain risk | Sole-supply and lead-time risks are flagged | Yes |
| 11 | Term distinction | Intelligence-tiering and the Harness six layers are not conflated | Yes |
| 12 | Placeholder cleanup | No non-standard placeholders such as XX, ___ | Yes |
5. Summary
The Harness logic of the actuator direction can be summarized in one sentence: the actuator is the physical form of the L2 tool contract. In the software domain, the tool contract specifies "what input this tool accepts, what output it promises, and what happens beyond the boundary"; in the actuator domain, this set of promises is translated into rated torque, transmission precision, backlash, efficiency, and lifetime — and once installed on a machine, this can no longer be modified through version updates.
Three engineering conclusions. First, the route debate has no endgame; the working condition decides the selection: the high torque density of flexible actuators, the force transparency of QDD, and the degrees-of-freedom advantage of tendons each carry a cost. Tesla trades a tendon + screw composite for 22 degrees of freedom, and Unitree trades an outer rotor + planetaries for leg-and-foot quasi-direct drive, showing that the right question is not "which route wins" but "what is this joint's load spectrum and control demand." Second, domestic substitution is rewriting the price curve and the precision curve at the same time: Leadrive's third-harmonic 10-arcsecond precision, 30%–70% pricing, and 1–2 month lead time turn the actuator from an "imported custom part" into a "domestic standard part" — the supply-chain precondition for whole machines to move from prototypes to ten-thousand-unit mass production (Unitree 5,500 units, AgileX 10,000 units). Third, standards are the arbiter of the actuator: GB/T 43200-2023 gives integrated-joint performance a national-level test method, turning "actuator specifications ≈ tool contract" from an analogy into an executable acceptance process.
Information-Gap Statement
The following items have not been confirmed by a first-hand source and have been marked in the body of this document:
- The specific usage and precision of RV reducers (Nabtesco) in humanoid robots: no reliable data was found in this round,
[To be filled]. - Tesla Optimus's official full specifications (degrees of freedom, torque, camera configuration): Tesla has never officially released them; third-party compilations such as humanoid.press are of medium-to-low reliability, for reference only and marked as such.
- The Gen-3's fault-free operating time of about 500 hours and "1,000+ units internally deployed": supply-chain rumors and third-party claims with medium-to-low reliability.
- The four harmonic-reducer global-share figures (Harmonic Drive about 40% / 58% / over 80%, Chinese vendors 75%) diverge sharply; they are only presented side by side, with the statistical-figure differences noted.
- Tuopu Group's roughly 3 billion yuan rotating-joint order and its planned annual capacity of 1 million units: rumor-level figures, not cited by this document as fact.
- Galbot's six-degree-of-freedom manipulation accuracy error of under 0.5 mm: company/encyclopedia figures, lacking third-party reproduction.
- The original URL of Unitree's prospectus was not obtained; figures such as the over-90% self-developed/self-manufactured rate come via media retelling.
6. References
- Panoramic Analysis of Robot Motor Technology — Future Think Tank, 2025-12. https://www.industrysourcing.cn/article/471909
- Unitree's official support page (H1 / G1 / M107 motor specifications) — Unitree. https://support.unitree.com/home
- Fourier GR-3 launch report — Securities Times, 2025-08-06. https://www.stcn.com/article/detail/2975614.html
- Official exhibitor introduction at the World Robot Conference (Inspire Robots RH5DG2, etc.) — World Robot Conference, 2025. https://www.worldrobotconference.com/news/3235.html
- Guidelines on Innovation and Development of Humanoid Robots — Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, 2023-11. https://www.ncsti.gov.cn/zcfg/zcwj/202311/P020231103482413965397.pdf
- Report on China's release of the humanoid-robot and embodied-intelligence standard system (2026 edition) — People's Daily Overseas Edition, 2026-02-28. https://peoplesdaily.pdnews.cn/china/er/30051524844
- Collaborative Robot Safety Standards 2026: ISO 10218-2025 — EVS Int, 2025. https://www.evsint.com/zh-CN/collaborative-robot-safety-standards-2026-iso-10218-2025-ts-15066/
- Collaborative Robot Safety Standards — InMotion Global. https://www.inmotion.global/resources/cobot-safety/collaborative-robot-safety-standards/
- Embodied Intelligence Accelerates in Depth — Digital China, 2025-12. https://www.digitalchina.gov.cn/2025/xwzx/szkx/202512/t20251230_5263761.htm
- Embodied Intelligence: Decoding the Breakthrough Path of China's Robot Industry — Zhonghong Net, 2026-06. https://www.zhonghongwang.com/show-278-464160-1.html
- Robotic Integrated Joints — Performance and Test Methods (GB/T 43200-2023) — national standard, National Technical Committee on Robotics Standardization (SAC/TC 591), URL unconfirmed; cited by title + standard number.
- Specification for Inspection of Robot Multi-Dimensional Force/Torque Sensors (GB/T 43199-2023) — national standard, National Technical Committee on Robotics Standardization (SAC/TC 591), URL unconfirmed; cited by title + standard number.
- Well-Known Domestic Manufacturers of Six-Dimensional Force Sensors for Industrial Robots — Sensitive Components and Sensors Branch, China Electronic Components Industry Association, 2026-03-10. http://sensor.ic-ceca.org.cn/hangyezixun/508.html